FBDC vs. RAVI
FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and RAVI (FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while RAVI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by FlexShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RAVI.
Performance
FBDC vs. RAVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than RAVI's 1.69% return.
FBDC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAVI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
FBDC vs. RAVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -10.39% | -2.66% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.69% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBDC and RAVI is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBDC vs. RAVI — Risk / Return Rank
FBDC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RAVI
FBDC vs. RAVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBDC | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 5.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 37.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 214.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBDC vs. RAVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than RAVI's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and RAVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBDC | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -3.72% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.04% | 0.00% | -18.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.44% | -0.17% | -10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
FBDC vs. RAVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBDC | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 0.41% | +17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 1.41% | +16.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 1.28% | +16.72% |
FBDC vs. RAVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RAVI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBDC vs. RAVI - Dividend Comparison
FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.63%, more than RAVI's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.63% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.37% | 4.59% | 5.34% | 4.55% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.53% | 2.22% | 1.28% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBDC and RAVI have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.63%, compared with 4.37% for RAVI.
FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while RAVI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.25% for RAVI.
Find the right allocation for FBDC and RAVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer