FBAQX vs. FNILX
FBAQX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class M) and FNILX (Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FBAQX is a Allocation--50% to 70% Equity fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FNILX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FBAQX returned 23.35% vs 27.60% for FNILX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBAQX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FNILX.
Performance
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAQX achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 10.70% return.
FBAQX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNILX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 27.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBAQX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class M | 9.56% | 14.51% | 1.86% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 10.70% | 17.81% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAQX and FNILX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FBAQX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAQX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAQX
FNILX
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class M (FBAQX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAQX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.42 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.08 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.51 | 14.10 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAQX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.33 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.76 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAQX drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAQX and FNILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAQX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -33.76% | +21.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -9.01% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.77% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -5.37% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 1.97% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class M (FBAQX) is 2.61%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that FBAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAQX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 3.00% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 9.01% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 11.96% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 17.25% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.56% | 20.04% | -8.48% |
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAQX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAQX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison
FBAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAQX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class M | 4.67% | 5.15% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.17% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FBAQX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNILX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to FBAQX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAQX dropped -12.64% vs FNILX's -33.76%.
FBAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAQX and FNILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer