PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAZ vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAZ vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAZ vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAZ achieves a 33.01% return, which is significantly higher than TSMG's 16.19% return.


FAZ

1D
-6.11%
1M
11.41%
YTD
33.01%
6M
26.95%
1Y
-7.23%
3Y*
-36.21%
5Y*
-29.62%
10Y*
-43.10%

TSMG

1D
13.90%
1M
-20.55%
YTD
16.19%
6M
30.36%
1Y
227.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAZ vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAZ has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAZ vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAZ
FAZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAZ vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAZTSMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

2.98

-3.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

3.08

-2.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.39

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

6.44

-6.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

20.11

-20.36

FAZ vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAZ and TSMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAZTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

2.98

-3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

1.00

-1.73

Correlation

The correlation between FAZ and TSMG is -0.28. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FAZ vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

FAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than TSMG's 9.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
2.56%5.07%7.34%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.63%0.56%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
9.88%11.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAZ vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZ and TSMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAZTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-63.67%

-36.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.53%

-35.29%

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-26.30%

-73.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-18.22%

-80.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.00%

11.30%

+30.70%

Volatility

FAZ vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) is 13.94%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 29.05%. This indicates that FAZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAZTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.94%

29.05%

-15.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.73%

54.76%

-21.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.30%

77.02%

-18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.10%

81.35%

-25.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.13%

81.35%

-19.22%