FAZ vs. ORLG
FAZ (Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares) and ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FAZ tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (-300%) while ORLG tracks the O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. FAZ charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ORLG.
Performance
FAZ vs. ORLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAZ
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- -24.30%
- 3Y*
- -40.38%
- 5Y*
- -32.90%
- 10Y*
- -44.36%
ORLG
- 1D
- 8.37%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- 6M
- -23.86%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAZ vs. ORLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | -15.32% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | -25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAZ and ORLG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAZ vs. ORLG — Risk / Return Rank
FAZ
ORLG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FAZ vs. ORLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAZ | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAZ vs. ORLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ORLG's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZ and ORLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAZ | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -39.93% | -60.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -34.91% | -65.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.12% | -20.65% | -78.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FAZ vs. ORLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAZ | ORLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.71% | 59.08% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.53% | 59.08% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.83% | 59.08% | +2.75% |
FAZ vs. ORLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAZ has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ORLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAZ vs. ORLG - Dividend Comparison
FAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while ORLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares | 3.54% | 5.07% | 7.34% | 4.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.63% | 0.56% |
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAZ and ORLG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FAZ.
FAZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.00% for ORLG.
FAZ tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (-300%), while ORLG tracks O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FAZ and 0.75% for ORLG.
Find the right allocation for FAZ and ORLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer