PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAXGX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAXGX having a 12.09% return and FQLSX slightly higher at 12.26%.


FAXGX

1D
2.34%
1M
-1.02%
6M
8.19%
YTD
12.09%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.39%

FQLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.35%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAXGX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z
12.09%22.78%13.65%20.53%-18.96%16.36%17.96%9.10%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
12.26%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FAXGX and FQLSX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FAXGX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAXGX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAXGX
FAXGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FAXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FAXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAXGXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.42

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

10.10

-0.27

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAXGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAXGX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAXGX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAXGX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAXGXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-31.26%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.48%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-15.37%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

-27.41%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.17%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-5.36%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.27%

+0.03%

Volatility

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAXGXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.40%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

12.17%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

14.19%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.36%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.12%

+1.13%

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAXGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAXGX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FAXGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAXGX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z
3.33%2.52%2.91%1.98%5.31%6.81%3.44%2.84%0.00%0.00%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.66%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FAXGX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FAXGX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAXGX dropped -31.34% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAXGX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer