PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAXGX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAXGX having a 13.95% return and FDFPX slightly higher at 14.11%.


FAXGX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.42%
YTD
13.95%
6M
15.43%
1Y
31.06%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*

FDFPX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.45%
YTD
14.11%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAXGX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z
13.95%22.78%13.65%20.53%-18.96%16.36%17.96%9.10%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
14.11%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FAXGX and FDFPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

1.00

The correlation between FAXGX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAXGX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAXGX
FAXGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FAXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FAXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAXGXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.33

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

14.77

-0.22

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAXGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAXGX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAXGXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.81

-0.06

Drawdowns

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAXGX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAXGX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAXGXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-31.22%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.54%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-15.42%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

-27.41%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-5.85%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.15%

+0.02%

Volatility

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z (FAXGX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAXGXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.15%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

10.33%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

12.56%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

15.09%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.18%

+0.05%

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAXGX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAXGX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

FAXGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than FDFPX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FAXGX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class Z
3.27%2.52%2.91%1.98%5.31%6.81%3.44%2.84%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.75%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FAXGX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAXGX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FDFPX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAXGX dropped -31.34% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAXGX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer