PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATKX vs. PPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATKX achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than PPLIX's 8.51% return.


FATKX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.76%
YTD
6.91%
6M
7.62%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*

PPLIX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.83%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
6.91%15.14%11.68%13.16%-15.93%9.13%13.79%18.14%-5.20%6.72%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
8.51%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FATKX and PPLIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FATKX and PPLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATKX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATKX
FATKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FATKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FATKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FATKXPPLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.34

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.51

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

11.27

+2.49

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the PPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATKX and PPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FATKXPPLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.85

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.60

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.45

+0.38

Drawdowns

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATKX drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATKX and PPLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATKXPPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-55.61%

+33.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-8.57%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.64%

-15.59%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-26.85%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.86%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-8.30%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.90%

-0.65%

Volatility

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) is 2.66%, while Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that FATKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATKXPPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.39%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

9.25%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.97%

11.60%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

15.47%

-6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

15.59%

-6.31%

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATKX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATKX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison

FATKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, less than PPLIX's 9.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.93%7.70%8.73%2.94%10.06%12.30%6.93%6.79%7.43%3.18%0.00%0.00%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.17%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FATKX and PPLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PPLIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to FATKX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATKX dropped -22.44% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.

FATKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATKX and PPLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer