PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATKX vs. FHPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATKX achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than FHPDX's 5.44% return.


FATKX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.60%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.96%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*

FHPDX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.94%
YTD
5.44%
6M
5.75%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.25%15.14%11.68%13.16%-15.93%9.13%13.79%18.14%-7.24%
FHPDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6
5.44%11.22%5.32%9.88%-13.04%5.31%10.90%14.58%-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FATKX and FHPDX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FATKX and FHPDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATKX vs. FHPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATKX
FATKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FATKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FATKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FHPDX
FHPDX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FHPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FHPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FATKXFHPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.54

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.29

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.19

14.24

-0.05

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FHPDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATKX and FHPDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FATKXFHPDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.59

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.82

+0.02

Drawdowns

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATKX drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than FHPDX's maximum drawdown of -18.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATKX and FHPDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATKXFHPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-18.48%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-3.96%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.64%

-5.86%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-18.48%

-3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-3.78%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.91%

+0.34%

Volatility

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX) at 2.01%. This indicates that FATKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATKXFHPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.01%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

4.16%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.96%

5.01%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

6.46%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

6.72%

+2.56%

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATKX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FHPDX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATKX vs. FHPDX - Dividend Comparison

FATKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than FHPDX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.90%7.70%8.73%2.94%10.06%12.30%6.93%6.79%7.43%3.18%
FHPDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6
2.99%3.16%2.99%2.79%5.75%6.10%3.54%2.44%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FATKX and FHPDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FATKX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FHPDX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATKX dropped -22.44% vs FHPDX's -18.48%.

FHPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATKX and FHPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer