FASVX vs. DFSMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FASVX (Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FASVX returned 3.30%/yr vs 2.65%/yr for DFSMX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FASVX charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.

Performance

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FASVX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASVX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 1.27% return.

FASVX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.76%
• 6M: -1.35%
• YTD: -0.53%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 3.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.95%

DFSMX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.95%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.25%
• 3Y*: 2.65%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: 1.23%
• ALL TIME*: 1.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FASVX Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FASVX Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z	-0.53%	5.38%	1.45%	6.03%	0.36%
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	1.27%	2.30%	2.84%	2.98%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FASVX and DFSMX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.37

Return for Risk

FASVX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FASVX

FASVX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DFSMX

DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 100
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FASVX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FASVX	DFSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	4.43	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	11.32	-9.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	5.99	-4.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	22.52	-21.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.65	86.52	-82.87

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASVX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASVX drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASVX and DFSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASVX	DFSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-2.66%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-0.11%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.16%	-0.49%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	0.00%	-2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-0.23%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	0.03%	+1.04%

Volatility

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FASVX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.17%. This indicates that FASVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASVX	DFSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	0.17%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	0.38%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	0.54%	+1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	0.79%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	0.76%	+2.72%

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASVX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASVX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

FASVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than DFSMX's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.53%	2.08%	2.80%	1.94%	0.63%	0.19%	0.83%	1.22%	1.11%	0.95%	0.94%	0.95%
FASVX Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class Z	2.92%	3.12%	3.12%	2.61%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASVX and DFSMX in my portfolio?

FASVX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FASVX or DFSMX?

FASVX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to DFSMX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASVX dropped -5.97% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.