PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASUX vs. FSMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FASUX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASUX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FSMUX's 1.59% return.


FASUX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.35%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.33%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
10Y*

FSMUX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FASUX
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
0.96%5.32%1.38%5.99%0.34%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
1.59%3.14%2.99%6.78%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FASUX and FSMUX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.84

The correlation between FASUX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASUX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASUX
FASUX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FASUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FASUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMUX
FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FASUX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASUXFSMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.68

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.96

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

10.85

-4.61

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASUX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASUX drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASUX and FSMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASUXFSMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-16.27%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-2.68%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-5.95%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-5.40%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.71%

+0.24%

Volatility

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I (FASUX) is 0.64%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that FASUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASUXFSMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.84%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

2.06%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

3.09%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.62%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.62%

-1.13%

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASUX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASUX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

FASUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than FSMUX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FASUX
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class I
3.07%3.06%3.06%2.57%1.14%0.00%
FSMUX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund
2.98%3.26%3.74%3.18%2.14%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASUX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMUX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to FASUX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASUX dropped -5.97% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASUX and FSMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer