PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASJX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASJX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FASJX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASJX achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 9.94% return.


FASJX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.76%
6M
-1.48%
YTD
-0.68%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.66%

FZROX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.73%
6M
8.29%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FASJX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FASJX
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
-0.68%5.16%1.02%5.74%0.22%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
9.94%17.23%23.94%26.20%-7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FASJX and FZROX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.15

The correlation between FASJX and FZROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASJX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FASJX
FASJX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FASJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FASJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASJX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FASJX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FASJX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASJXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.12

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

9.14

-5.89

FASJX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASJX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASJX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASJX drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASJX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASJXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-34.96%

+29.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-8.89%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

-19.38%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.85%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-5.43%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.06%

-0.95%

Volatility

FASJX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A (FASJX) is 0.89%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FASJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASJXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

3.43%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

10.34%

-8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43%

13.19%

-10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.46%

17.54%

-14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.46%

20.04%

-16.58%

FASJX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASJX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASJX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FASJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FASJX
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.64%2.82%2.80%2.34%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASJX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FASJX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASJX dropped -5.90% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FASJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASJX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer