FASE.L vs. LCPE.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FASE.L (Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - FASE.L tracks the FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FASE.L returned 8.64%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for LCPE.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FASE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.

Performance

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (FASE.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASE.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 13.89% return.

FASE.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 2.98%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 12.81%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: —

LCPE.L

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 11.95%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 9.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FASE.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)	5.03%	20.17%	9.31%	4.95%	-2.71%	15.34%
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS	13.89%	18.27%	-2.33%	10.46%	-0.17%	15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FASE.L and LCPE.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FASE.L and LCPE.L has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASE.L

FASE.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
FASE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FASE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FASE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FASE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FASE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

LCPE.L

LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (FASE.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FASE.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.39	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.38	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.42	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.07	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	12.41	-8.01

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASE.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASE.L drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASE.L and LCPE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASE.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-27.75%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-6.66%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.20%	-12.39%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.61%	-12.39%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-2.97%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-3.94%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.19%	+1.31%

Volatility

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (FASE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.63%. This indicates that FASE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASE.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	3.63%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	8.67%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	11.33%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	12.90%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	14.18%	-1.23%

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASE.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

FASE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FASE.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)	2.71%	2.61%	3.72%	3.54%	3.47%	2.35%
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASE.L and LCPE.L in my portfolio?

FASE.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FASE.L or LCPE.L?

On fees, FASE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FASE.L or LCPE.L?

FASE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

What is the main difference between FASE.L and LCPE.L?

FASE.L tracks FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FASE.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.