FASA.L vs. MIBX.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FASA.L (Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - FASA.L tracks the FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FASA.L returned 12.75%/yr vs 27.36%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FASA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.

Performance

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASA.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 16.48% return.

FASA.L

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 2.28%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 1Y: 15.33%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MIBX.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.87%
• 6M: 14.58%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 1Y: 33.66%
• 3Y*: 27.36%
• 5Y*: 21.21%
• 10Y*: 16.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FASA.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)	4.29%	21.28%	9.36%	4.57%	-2.43%	3.75%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	16.48%	43.78%	13.17%	30.61%	-3.53%	1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FASA.L and MIBX.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.68

The correlation between FASA.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASA.L

FASA.L Risk / Return Rank: 41
FASA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FASA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FASA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FASA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FASA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MIBX.L

MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FASA.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.20	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.98	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	3.26	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.47	11.61	-7.14

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASA.L and MIBX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASA.L drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASA.L and MIBX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASA.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-67.93%	+55.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-10.26%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.35%	-15.64%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-3.15%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-39.72%	+36.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.89%	+0.61%

Volatility

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L) is 3.42%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FASA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASA.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	3.96%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	12.71%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.79%	15.22%	-3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.10%	17.93%	-4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.10%	18.83%	-5.73%

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASA.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison

FASA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASA.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	3.16%	3.68%	3.93%	3.73%	3.88%	2.09%	1.55%	4.02%	4.05%	2.75%	3.56%	3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASA.L and MIBX.L in my portfolio?

FASA.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FASA.L or MIBX.L?

On fees, FASA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FASA.L or MIBX.L?

FASA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.

What is the main difference between FASA.L and MIBX.L?

FASA.L tracks FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FASA.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.