FARYX vs. CGFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fulcrum Diversified Absolute Return Fund (FARYX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX).
FARYX is managed by Fulcrum. It was launched on Jul 30, 2015. CGFIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Oct 31, 1990.
Performance
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FARYX Fulcrum Diversified Absolute Return Fund | 6.28% | 13.34% | 7.19% | 0.79% | 2.19% | 4.30% | 9.81% | 7.62% | -1.91% | 1.90% |
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund | -0.35% | 5.79% | 4.85% | -2.54% | -9.99% | 1.39% | 6.37% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 1.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FARYX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FARYX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 5.29%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
FARYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
CGFIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FARYX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FARYX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FARYX
CGFIX
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fulcrum Diversified Absolute Return Fund (FARYX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FARYX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 1.48 | +1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | 2.04 | +1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.29 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.55 | 1.93 | +4.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.31 | 8.06 | +14.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FARYX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 1.48 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | -0.01 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.40 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.89 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FARYX and CGFIX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison
FARYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than CGFIX's 6.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FARYX Fulcrum Diversified Absolute Return Fund | 6.76% | 7.18% | 4.39% | 0.89% | 1.28% | 8.96% | 7.79% | 0.63% | 8.88% | 3.39% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund | 6.14% | 5.51% | 6.43% | 2.08% | 0.00% | 7.49% | 0.23% | 3.29% | 6.05% | 0.33% | 1.12% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FARYX drawdown since its inception was -7.41%, smaller than the maximum CGFIX drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARYX and CGFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FARYX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -20.28% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | -2.78% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.87% | -20.28% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.41% | -20.28% | +12.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -3.32% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -3.20% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.67% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FARYX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison
Fulcrum Diversified Absolute Return Fund (FARYX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that FARYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FARYX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 1.50% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | 2.12% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.90% | 3.48% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.30% | 5.76% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 4.74% | +1.01% |