FARVX vs. SSBRX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FARVX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2020 Fund Class A) and SSBRX (State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FARVX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SSBRX.

Performance

FARVX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2020 Fund Class A (FARVX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FARVX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SSBRX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 4.04%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 10.40%
• 5Y*: 4.92%
• 10Y*: 7.55%
• ALL TIME*: 7.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SSBRX State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FARVX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FARVX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2020 Fund Class A	4.91%	11.99%	5.60%	10.44%	-14.84%	6.49%	11.79%	15.89%	-4.69%	13.04%
SSBRX State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund	6.02%	12.93%	8.73%	13.61%	-15.51%	10.03%	14.68%	20.73%	-5.47%	14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FARVX and SSBRX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.95

The correlation between FARVX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FARVX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FARVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SSBRX

SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FARVX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2020 Fund Class A (FARVX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FARVX	SSBRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.41	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FARVX	SSBRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-21.96%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.67%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.68%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FARVX	SSBRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.94%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.86%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	9.75%	—

FARVX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARVX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

FARVX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

FARVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than SSBRX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FARVX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2020 Fund Class A	2.31%	2.59%	2.48%	2.24%	3.28%	4.43%	3.60%	2.90%	6.63%	24.94%	1.97%	4.19%
SSBRX State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund	5.72%	6.07%	6.67%	4.60%	6.60%	6.44%	4.74%	6.58%	5.35%	0.60%	1.84%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FARVX and SSBRX in my portfolio?

FARVX and SSBRX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.