PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FARSX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARSX achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than FRHMX's 4.14% return.


FARSX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.81%
YTD
4.67%
6M
4.96%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
5.42%

FRHMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.37%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FARSX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A
4.67%10.71%4.91%9.25%-13.76%5.06%10.62%4.60%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
4.14%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FARSX and FRHMX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FARSX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FARSX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARSX
FARSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FARSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FARSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FARSXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.52

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.13

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

13.40

-0.55

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARSX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FARSXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARSX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARSX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FARSXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-15.96%

-24.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-3.42%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-4.90%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-15.96%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.50%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.80%

+0.12%

Volatility

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A (FARSX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FARSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FARSXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.67%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

3.43%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81%

4.16%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

5.29%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

5.15%

+1.20%

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FARSX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

FARSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than FRHMX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FARSX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund Class A
2.59%2.63%2.64%2.32%4.65%4.97%3.17%3.05%6.06%23.98%1.80%4.22%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.25%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FARSX and FRHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FARSX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to FRHMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARSX dropped -40.28% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

FRHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FARSX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer