PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAQTX vs. MLLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAQTX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FAQTX has outperformed MLLIX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while MLLIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.85% annualized return.


FAQTX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.36%
6M
2.96%
YTD
5.75%
1Y
11.86%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
8.94%

MLLIX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.16%
6M
2.00%
YTD
3.40%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
4.85%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
5.75%16.70%12.40%16.47%-16.54%15.16%17.15%22.78%-5.50%20.65%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
3.40%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%6.63%10.06%13.91%-2.37%8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FAQTX and MLLIX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2014

0.84

The correlation between FAQTX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAQTX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAQTX
FAQTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FAQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FAQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAQTXMLLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.86

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

8.21

-1.04

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAQTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the MLLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAQTX and MLLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAQTX drawdown since its inception was -26.70%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAQTX and MLLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAQTXMLLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-17.32%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-3.86%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.56%

-5.72%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-16.08%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

-16.08%

-10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-0.72%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-2.14%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.87%

+0.74%

Volatility

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1 (FAQTX) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.00%. This indicates that FAQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAQTXMLLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

1.00%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

3.64%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.03%

4.51%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

5.94%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

5.71%

+6.95%

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAQTX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAQTX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison

FAQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than MLLIX's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAQTX
American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund Class F-1
5.67%6.00%4.26%2.61%5.41%5.26%3.56%4.23%4.82%2.43%3.73%5.68%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
7.70%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAQTX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAQTX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to MLLIX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAQTX dropped -26.70% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.

MLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAQTX and MLLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer