PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPR vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAPR vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAPR vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
1.26%7.58%18.14%19.50%-10.33%8.65%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
2.56%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-3.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 2.56% return.


FAPR

1D
0.17%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.33%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
10Y*

EAPR

1D
1.94%
1M
1.25%
YTD
2.56%
6M
4.21%
1Y
14.77%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAPR vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAPR vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPR
FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPR vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPREAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.87

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

2.77

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.11

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

15.78

-10.05

FAPR vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPREAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.87

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.40

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and EAPR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FAPR vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAPR nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPREAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-17.65%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-6.99%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-4.18%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.94%

+0.80%

Volatility

FAPR vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is 1.77%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that FAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAPREAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

3.08%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

7.95%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

9.85%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

9.85%

+0.73%