PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPGX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
0.49%4.57%5.32%5.28%0.57%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
0.00%52.17%49.68%78.49%-16.54%

Returns By Period


FAPGX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*

FSELX

1D
-4.27%
1M
-9.75%
YTD
0.00%
6M
7.40%
1Y
85.27%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
30.67%
10Y*
31.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAPGX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAPGX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPGX
FAPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FAPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPGXFSELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.77

2.07

+1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.86

2.72

+6.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.85

1.38

+1.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

14.12

4.58

+9.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

57.66

18.71

+38.95

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPGX and FSELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPGXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77

2.07

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.87

0.49

+3.37

Correlation

The correlation between FAPGX and FSELX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FAPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FSELX's 11.11% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAPGX
Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond
4.26%4.40%4.81%3.44%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
11.11%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Drawdowns

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPGX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPGX and FSELX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPGXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-82.54%

+82.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-17.23%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-14.38%

+14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-28.82%

+28.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

4.21%

-4.14%

Volatility

FAPGX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) is 0.28%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that FAPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAPGXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

10.47%

-10.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.82%

24.91%

-24.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

40.89%

-39.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.06%

38.58%

-37.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.06%

34.71%

-33.65%