FAOIX vs. LIAGX
FAOIX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, FAOIX returned 8.78%/yr vs 21.58%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAOIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
LIAGX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 27.26%
- 6M
- 28.28%
- 1Y
- 39.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOIX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I | 0.00% | 15.25% | 4.92% | 20.35% | -24.38% | 7.20% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.26% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOIX and LIAGX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAOIX and LIAGX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAOIX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAOIX
LIAGX
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I (FAOIX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAOIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 2.83 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 11.39 | -11.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAOIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.00 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.44 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOIX drawdown since its inception was -59.86%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOIX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.86% | -37.87% | -21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -14.56% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.98% | -17.11% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -0.41% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.20% | -13.23% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.62% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I (FAOIX) is 0.00%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that FAOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAOIX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 8.33% | -8.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.99% | 17.98% | -13.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 20.66% | -11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 18.79% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 18.79% | -2.10% |
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAOIX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
FAOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOIX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class I | 8.49% | 8.49% | 1.66% | 0.96% | 0.63% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 1.35% | 5.09% | 3.79% | 1.49% | 0.63% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAOIX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to FAOIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOIX dropped -59.86% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAOIX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer