PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAOAX vs. FTCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FAOAX has underperformed FTCNX with an annualized return of 8.05%, while FTCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


FAOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
8.05%

FTCNX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
4.08%
6M
3.22%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
0.00%14.93%4.63%20.01%-24.61%18.90%14.71%27.39%-15.10%29.66%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.08%25.18%8.57%14.02%-6.70%26.10%3.82%25.08%-14.85%12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FAOAX and FTCNX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FAOAX and FTCNX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAOAX vs. FTCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOAX
FAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCNX
FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAOAXFTCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.72

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

5.48

-6.01

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FTCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOAX and FTCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOAX drawdown since its inception was -60.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FTCNX drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOAX and FTCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAOAXFTCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.03%

-58.27%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-7.65%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-12.23%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.50%

-21.21%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.50%

-39.92%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.87%

-4.00%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-12.36%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.40%

+1.78%

Volatility

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that FAOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAOAXFTCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.99%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

10.19%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

12.93%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.00%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

17.39%

-1.02%

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOAX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAOAX vs. FTCNX - Dividend Comparison

FAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than FTCNX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
8.54%8.54%1.33%0.74%0.38%2.12%0.00%1.37%4.64%3.64%1.75%0.38%
FTCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M
4.93%5.13%6.90%2.83%3.47%4.58%1.99%3.89%6.55%0.90%1.08%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAOAX and FTCNX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCNX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOAX dropped -60.03% vs FTCNX's -58.27%.

FTCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAOAX and FTCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer