FANCX vs. PONPX
FANCX (Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C) and PONPX (PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2) are both mutual funds - FANCX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while PONPX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 5 years, FANCX returned 1.18%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for PONPX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FANCX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PONPX.
Performance
FANCX vs. PONPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANCX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than PONPX's 0.55% return.
FANCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- —
PONPX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
FANCX vs. PONPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C | -0.01% | 4.38% | 3.74% | 3.91% | -4.63% | -1.81% | 2.74% | 2.90% | 0.23% | -0.02% |
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 0.55% | 10.96% | 5.33% | 9.24% | -9.14% | 2.51% | 5.73% | 7.99% | 0.53% | 8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FANCX and PONPX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FANCX and PONPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANCX vs. PONPX — Risk / Return Rank
FANCX
PONPX
FANCX vs. PONPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FANCX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.78 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 5.93 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FANCX vs. PONPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANCX drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, smaller than the maximum PONPX drawdown of -13.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANCX and PONPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANCX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -13.41% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | -3.69% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.18% | -3.86% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.24% | -13.41% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.35% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -1.44% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 1.10% | -0.70% |
Volatility
FANCX vs. PONPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) is 0.66%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that FANCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FANCX | PONPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 1.23% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 3.48% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82% | 4.12% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 4.87% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 4.25% | -2.48% |
FANCX vs. PONPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FANCX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PONPX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
FANCX vs. PONPX - Dividend Comparison
FANCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than PONPX's 5.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 0.15% | 0.36% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 0.69% | 0.21% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 | 5.71% | 5.91% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 4.89% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 5.73% | 5.56% | 5.27% | 5.42% | 7.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FANCX and PONPX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PONPX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to FANCX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANCX dropped -7.79% vs PONPX's -13.41%.
PONPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FANCX and PONPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer