PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FANCX vs. FBNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANCX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than FBNTX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FANCX has underperformed FBNTX with an annualized return of 1.03%, while FBNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.85% annualized return.


FANCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.24%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
1.03%
ALL TIME*
1.04%

FBNTX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.36%
6M
0.22%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
2.18%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
1.85%
ALL TIME*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
-0.01%4.38%3.74%3.91%-4.63%-1.81%2.74%2.90%0.23%-0.02%
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
0.43%5.14%4.62%4.72%-4.00%-1.08%3.60%3.98%0.96%0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FANCX and FBNTX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2016

0.68

The correlation between FANCX and FBNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FANCX vs. FBNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FANCX
FANCX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FANCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FANCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FANCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FANCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FANCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FBNTX
FBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FANCXFBNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.08

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

7.32

-2.60

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FANCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the FBNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANCX and FBNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANCX drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, which is greater than FBNTX's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANCX and FBNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FANCXFBNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-6.64%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.18%

-1.29%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

-1.29%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.13%

-6.34%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.79%

-6.64%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.40%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-1.01%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.36%

+0.06%

Volatility

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) is 0.37%, while Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that FANCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FANCXFBNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.45%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

1.39%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81%

1.86%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

2.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

1.82%

-0.05%

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FANCX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FBNTX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FANCX vs. FBNTX - Dividend Comparison

FANCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than FBNTX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FANCX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
2.82%3.20%2.95%1.75%0.15%0.36%1.68%1.00%0.69%0.21%0.07%
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
3.61%4.05%3.79%2.53%0.67%0.87%2.51%1.92%1.54%1.06%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FANCX and FBNTX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBNTX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to FANCX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FANCX dropped -7.79% vs FBNTX's -6.64%.

FBNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FANCX and FBNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer