FAMVX vs. CCSMX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) and CCSMX (Conestoga SMid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMVX returned 10.39%/yr vs 9.16%/yr for CCSMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMVX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CCSMX.

Performance

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMVX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than CCSMX's -6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMVX has outperformed CCSMX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while CCSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.16% annualized return.

FAMVX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 4.48%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 1Y: 7.93%
• 3Y*: 12.20%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

CCSMX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: -10.79%
• YTD: -6.02%
• 1Y: -10.42%
• 3Y*: 1.08%
• 5Y*: -2.21%
• 10Y*: 9.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAMVX FAM Value Fund	8.18%	4.90%	15.51%	16.09%	-14.06%	25.65%	6.81%	30.31%	-6.15%	17.34%
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	-6.02%	-5.91%	10.44%	25.77%	-29.47%	15.26%	28.44%	33.48%	-0.09%	34.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMVX and CCSMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2014	0.84

The correlation between FAMVX and CCSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAMVX vs. CCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMVX

FAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CCSMX

CCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
CCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAMVX	CCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	-0.69	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	-0.93	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.90	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	-0.64	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	-1.24	+3.47

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the CCSMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMVX and CCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMVX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, which is greater than CCSMX's maximum drawdown of -37.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMVX and CCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMVX	CCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.12%	-37.34%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	-18.40%	+8.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.74%	-25.00%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.77%	-37.34%	+14.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.73%	-37.34%	-0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-19.67%	+19.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-10.29%	+3.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	9.38%	-6.24%

Volatility

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) is 3.81%, while Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that FAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMVX	CCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	5.20%	-1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.61%	12.33%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	16.94%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	20.57%	-3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	20.34%	-2.17%

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMVX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSMX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMVX vs. CCSMX - Dividend Comparison

FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than CCSMX's 2.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	2.32%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	1.04%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
FAMVX FAM Value Fund	4.53%	4.90%	6.28%	5.01%	3.67%	4.99%	3.69%	6.80%	4.09%	5.06%	5.21%	9.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMVX and CCSMX in my portfolio?

FAMVX and CCSMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAMVX or CCSMX?

CCSMX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FAMVX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMVX dropped -51.12% vs CCSMX's -37.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.