FAMFX vs. NESIX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and NESIX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FAMFX returned 2.89%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for NESIX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for NESIX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 65.50% return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- -10.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
NESIX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- 6M
- 45.39%
- YTD
- 65.50%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -0.66% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 65.50% | 11.16% | 13.47% | 5.85% | -29.71% | 11.36% | 73.06% | 55.28% | -4.87% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and NESIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and NESIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
NESIX
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.40 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 5.08 | -5.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 18.63 | -19.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum NESIX drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and NESIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -49.61% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.70% | -17.12% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -35.21% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -49.61% | +20.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.28% | -11.56% | -7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -14.87% | +8.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.20% | 4.65% | +7.55% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 4.86%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 12.48%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | NESIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 12.48% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 24.56% | -11.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.60% | 32.93% | -15.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 29.95% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 26.72% | -7.24% |
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.43% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
NESIX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.93% | 23.92% | 13.26% | 8.25% | 21.96% | 8.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NESIX has higher volatility (12.48%) compared to FAMFX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs NESIX's -49.61%.
NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and NESIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer