PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAIRX vs. VALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAIRX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than VALAX's 21.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FAIRX has underperformed VALAX with an annualized return of 8.93%, while VALAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.


FAIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
-4.70%
6M
-4.54%
YTD
3.06%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
8.93%

VALAX

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.17%
6M
16.46%
YTD
21.72%
1Y
40.12%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
3.06%29.49%-17.44%46.72%-20.49%6.87%47.76%32.06%-23.18%-5.94%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
21.72%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FAIRX and VALAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FAIRX and VALAX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAIRX vs. VALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIRX
FAIRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FAIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FAIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAIRXVALAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

4.72

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

18.16

-15.24

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAIRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the VALAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAIRX and VALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAIRX drawdown since its inception was -51.28%, smaller than the maximum VALAX drawdown of -61.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAIRX and VALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIRXVALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.28%

-61.26%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-8.56%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-25.81%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.50%

-25.81%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.50%

-38.22%

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.23%

-2.89%

-10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-10.70%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

2.22%

+3.67%

Volatility

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Volatility Comparison

Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Al Frank Fund (VALAX) at 5.37%. This indicates that FAIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIRXVALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

5.37%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.81%

11.89%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

14.78%

+10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.18%

17.91%

+8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

19.32%

+4.78%

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAIRX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VALAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAIRX vs. VALAX - Dividend Comparison

FAIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than VALAX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
0.56%0.58%0.71%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.83%2.23%1.29%7.29%69.79%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
7.11%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAIRX and VALAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAIRX has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to VALAX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAIRX dropped -51.28% vs VALAX's -61.26%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAIRX and VALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer