PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAIRX vs. CABDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) and AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAIRX achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than CABDX's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FAIRX has underperformed CABDX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while CABDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.


FAIRX

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
6.26%
6M
3.66%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
9.36%

CABDX

1D
0.70%
1M
2.88%
YTD
10.85%
6M
11.28%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
6.26%29.49%-17.44%46.72%-20.49%6.87%47.76%32.06%-23.18%-5.94%
CABDX
AB Relative Value Fund
10.85%10.26%12.63%11.24%-4.23%27.48%2.81%23.06%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FAIRX and CABDX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1999

0.65

The correlation between FAIRX and CABDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAIRX vs. CABDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIRX
FAIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FAIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FAIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CABDX
CABDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) and AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAIRXCABDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.40

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

12.35

-4.80

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the CABDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAIRX and CABDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAIRXCABDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.05

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.63

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.67

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.62

-0.16

Drawdowns

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAIRX drawdown since its inception was -51.28%, smaller than the maximum CABDX drawdown of -57.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAIRX and CABDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIRXCABDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.28%

-57.40%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.96%

-6.21%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-15.69%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.50%

-17.53%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.50%

-36.33%

-5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.54%

-0.28%

-10.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-8.44%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

1.71%

+3.06%

Volatility

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Volatility Comparison

Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) at 2.80%. This indicates that FAIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CABDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIRXCABDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

2.80%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.71%

7.89%

+9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

10.31%

+14.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.34%

14.44%

+11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

16.51%

+7.55%

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAIRX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CABDX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAIRX vs. CABDX - Dividend Comparison

FAIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than CABDX's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CABDX
AB Relative Value Fund
5.46%6.05%11.24%6.55%8.00%10.15%1.18%4.45%15.34%12.71%6.97%4.34%
FAIRX
Fairholme Fund
0.55%0.58%0.71%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.83%2.23%1.29%7.29%69.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAIRX and CABDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAIRX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to CABDX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAIRX dropped -51.28% vs CABDX's -57.40%.

CABDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAIRX and CABDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer