FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAHY.L (Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist) and UHYC.L (Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both High Yield Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAHY.L returned 5.13%/yr vs 5.82%/yr for UHYC.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAHY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UHYC.L.

Performance

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FAHY.L is traded in GBp, while UHYC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UHYC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHY.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than UHYC.L's 1.51% return.

FAHY.L

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 8.81%
• 3Y*: 5.13%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

UHYC.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 7.74%
• 3Y*: 5.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FAHY.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist	0.89%	2.08%	6.93%	4.14%	-0.25%
UHYC.L Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	1.47%	1.08%	9.84%	6.43%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHY.L and UHYC.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.69

The correlation between FAHY.L and UHYC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHY.L

FAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

UHYC.L

UHYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UHYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
UHYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
UHYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
UHYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAHY.L	UHYC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.19	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.68	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	1.91	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.82	5.76	+0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the UHYC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHY.L and UHYC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAHY.L	UHYC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.19	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.51	-0.07

Drawdowns

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than UHYC.L's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.L and UHYC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAHY.L	UHYC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-11.11%	-12.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.99%	-4.04%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.89%	-9.14%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.87%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-4.11%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	1.34%	+0.19%

Volatility

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) is 1.51%, while Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (UHYC.L) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that FAHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHYC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAHY.L	UHYC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	2.01%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.22%	5.12%	-0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.78%	6.49%	-0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.27%	8.97%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.96%	8.97%	+0.99%

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UHYC.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAHY.L vs. UHYC.L - Dividend Comparison

FAHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while UHYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FAHY.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist	6.55%	6.61%	6.89%	6.85%	5.66%	4.54%	6.26%	6.22%	6.01%	5.63%	1.23%
UHYC.L Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAHY.L and UHYC.L in my portfolio?

FAHY.L and UHYC.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FAHY.L or UHYC.L?

On fees, UHYC.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAHY.L or UHYC.L?

UHYC.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FAHY.L.

What is the main difference between FAHY.L and UHYC.L?

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FAHY.L and 0.25% for UHYC.L.