PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FAHY.L is traded in GBp, while GHYS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GHYS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHY.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than GHYS.L's 1.32% return.


FAHY.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

GHYS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
4.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
0.89%2.08%6.93%4.14%-3.51%6.81%5.36%9.22%0.08%-0.79%
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
1.32%7.56%6.95%11.60%-9.89%3.60%2.71%11.10%-3.20%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHY.L and GHYS.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2016

0.20

The correlation between FAHY.L and GHYS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHY.L
FAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYS.L
GHYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAHY.LGHYS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.88

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

8.55

-2.73

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHY.L and GHYS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAHY.LGHYS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.27

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.58

-0.15

Drawdowns

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, roughly equal to the maximum GHYS.L drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.L and GHYS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHY.LGHYS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-25.15%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-2.97%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.89%

-4.54%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

-14.70%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.34%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-2.29%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.65%

+0.88%

Volatility

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) have volatilities of 1.51% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHY.LGHYS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.48%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

3.79%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

4.40%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

5.98%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

7.15%

+2.81%

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHY.L vs. GHYS.L - Dividend Comparison

FAHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than GHYS.L's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%6.61%6.89%6.85%5.66%4.54%6.26%6.22%6.01%5.63%1.23%0.00%
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
5.73%5.68%5.78%5.36%4.41%3.78%4.08%5.03%4.89%4.58%4.91%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHY.L and GHYS.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FAHY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FAHY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYS.L.

FAHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYS.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FAHY.L and 0.55% for GHYS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHY.L and GHYS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer