PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FAHY.L is traded in GBp, while EHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EHYG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHY.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than EHYG.L's 1.51% return.


FAHY.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

EHYG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.51%
6M
2.00%
1Y
5.85%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAHY.L and EHYG.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHY.L
FAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EHYG.L
EHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAHY.LEHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.05

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

9.04

-3.21

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHY.L and EHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAHY.LEHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

2.41

-1.97

Drawdowns

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than EHYG.L's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.L and EHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHY.LEHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-3.19%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-2.85%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.89%

-3.19%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.14%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-0.32%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.65%

+0.88%

Volatility

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L) at 1.04%. This indicates that FAHY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHY.LEHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.04%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

3.05%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

3.58%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

3.58%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

3.58%

+6.38%

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EHYG.L's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHY.L vs. EHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

FAHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while EHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EHYG.L
iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%6.61%6.89%6.85%5.66%4.54%6.26%6.22%6.01%5.63%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHY.L and EHYG.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EHYG.L is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FAHY.L.

FAHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while EHYG.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate High Yield ESG SRI Bond Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FAHY.L and 0.27% for EHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHY.L and EHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer