PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHY.DE achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than HY3M.DE's 6.33% return.


FAHY.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
2.12%
6M
2.96%
YTD
4.63%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*

HY3M.DE

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.72%
YTD
6.33%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FAHY.DE
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
4.63%-2.30%10.83%6.42%-8.70%14.53%-0.82%16.15%3.21%
HY3M.DE
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
6.33%-3.30%18.25%4.13%-7.66%7.35%-3.67%17.71%-14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.59

The correlation between FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (5 years) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHY.DE
FAHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FAHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HY3M.DE
HY3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAHY.DEHY3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.41

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

10.01

-3.95

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than HY3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHY.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-21.08%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.08%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-12.09%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.30%

-13.58%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.17%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-7.04%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.05%

+0.26%

Volatility

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) at 1.97%. This indicates that FAHY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HY3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHY.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

1.97%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

5.14%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.67%

6.85%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

8.61%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

13.20%

+0.61%

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHY.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HY3M.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHY.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

FAHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, while HY3M.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAHY.DE
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.45%6.75%6.86%6.89%5.82%4.47%6.24%6.07%6.09%5.71%1.23%
HY3M.DE
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HY3M.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HY3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FAHY.DE.

FAHY.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HY3M.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. FAHY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FAHY.DE and 0.40% for HY3M.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHY.DE and HY3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer