PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHDX vs. FAHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAHDX having a 6.99% return and FAHCX slightly higher at 7.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAHDX having a 7.57% annualized return and FAHCX not far ahead at 7.82%.


FAHDX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.62%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.21%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.57%

FAHCX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.66%
YTD
7.16%
6M
8.28%
1Y
17.33%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAHDX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A
6.99%11.79%9.26%12.00%-11.37%10.78%8.72%17.39%-5.44%11.40%
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
7.16%12.06%9.50%12.15%-11.15%10.96%8.94%17.81%-5.25%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHDX and FAHCX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994

0.96

The correlation between FAHDX and FAHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHDX vs. FAHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHDX
FAHDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FAHDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FAHCX
FAHCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FAHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAHDXFAHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.13

3.14

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.60

4.62

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.63

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

5.65

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.07

23.75

-0.68

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the FAHCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHDX and FAHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAHDXFAHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

3.14

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.02

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

1.03

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.98

-0.08

Drawdowns

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHDX drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FAHCX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHDX and FAHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHDXFAHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-48.10%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-3.13%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.00%

-6.98%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

-15.16%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-28.49%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-4.62%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.74%

+0.01%

Volatility

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A (FAHDX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) have volatilities of 1.60% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHDXFAHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.67%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

4.37%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.51%

5.58%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

6.38%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.64%

7.63%

+0.01%

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHDX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FAHCX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHDX vs. FAHCX - Dividend Comparison

FAHDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than FAHCX's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
4.40%4.73%4.18%4.70%7.35%4.94%3.70%4.51%6.09%4.95%5.53%4.42%
FAHDX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class A
4.13%4.45%3.95%4.47%6.87%4.56%3.47%4.26%5.72%4.66%5.28%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FAHDX and FAHCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAHCX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to FAHDX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAHDX dropped -48.43% vs FAHCX's -48.10%.

FAHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHDX and FAHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer