PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) and WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGR.L achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than SUGA.L's -3.17% return.


FAGR.L

1D
-2.30%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
5.54%
6M
1.56%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
0.10%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*

SUGA.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-2.16%
1Y
-17.30%
3Y*
-11.77%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
-2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAGR.L
WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated
5.54%0.20%-7.02%-4.05%16.44%29.51%11.44%6.28%
SUGA.L
WisdomTree Sugar
-3.17%-17.47%-5.25%23.23%11.54%23.41%6.59%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGR.L and SUGA.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019

0.23

Over the past year, FAGR.L and SUGA.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGR.L
FAGR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SUGA.L
SUGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SUGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) and WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAGR.LSUGA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.90

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.79

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

-1.31

+2.13

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the SUGA.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGR.L and SUGA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAGR.LSUGA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

-0.70

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.05

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

-0.10

+0.86

Drawdowns

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGR.L drawdown since its inception was -29.85%, smaller than the maximum SUGA.L drawdown of -83.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGR.L and SUGA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAGR.LSUGA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-83.65%

+53.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-21.69%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-43.76%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.85%

-43.76%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.52%

-68.67%

+49.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-51.34%

+36.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

13.20%

-9.13%

Volatility

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) is 5.73%, while WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that FAGR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUGA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAGR.LSUGA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

8.76%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

18.33%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

24.70%

-12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

25.12%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

25.90%

0.00%

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FAGR.L and SUGA.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

FAGR.L vs. SUGA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAGR.L nor SUGA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FAGR.L and SUGA.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FAGR.L and SUGA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

FAGR.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture 3 Month Forward, while SUGA.L tracks Bloomberg Sugar.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAGR.L and SUGA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer