FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAGR.L (WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated) and SLVR.L (WisdomTree Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - FAGR.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Agriculture 3 Month Forward, while SLVR.L is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAGR.L returned 2.39%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for SLVR.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGR.L achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.L's 3.62% return.

FAGR.L

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: 0.10%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: —

SLVR.L

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 28.48%
• 1Y: 109.37%
• 3Y*: 43.40%
• 5Y*: 19.20%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FAGR.L WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated	5.54%	0.20%	-7.02%	-4.05%	16.44%	29.51%	11.44%	6.28%
SLVR.L WisdomTree Silver	3.62%	136.72%	20.15%	-2.57%	2.25%	-14.66%	40.61%	8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGR.L and SLVR.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019	0.09

Return for Risk

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGR.L

FAGR.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FAGR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FAGR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FAGR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FAGR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SLVR.L

SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 50
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAGR.L	SLVR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	1.85	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	2.21	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.33	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	2.67	-2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	5.81	-4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGR.L and SLVR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAGR.L	SLVR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	1.85	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.52	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.22	+0.55

Drawdowns

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGR.L drawdown since its inception was -29.85%, smaller than the maximum SLVR.L drawdown of -79.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGR.L and SLVR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAGR.L	SLVR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.85%	-79.93%	+50.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-40.74%	+32.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.43%	-40.74%	+18.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.85%	-40.74%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.52%	-35.42%	+15.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.30%	-49.43%	+34.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	18.74%	-14.67%

Volatility

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) is 5.73%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that FAGR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAGR.L	SLVR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	17.68%	-11.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	56.07%	-46.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	58.81%	-46.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.75%	36.80%	-14.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.90%	31.95%	-6.05%

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FAGR.L and SLVR.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

FAGR.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAGR.L nor SLVR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAGR.L and SLVR.L in my portfolio?

FAGR.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FAGR.L or SLVR.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAGR.L or SLVR.L?

FAGR.L and SLVR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

What is the main difference between FAGR.L and SLVR.L?

FAGR.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while SLVR.L is Silver. FAGR.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture 3 Month Forward, while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex.