FAGIX vs. EWL
FAGIX (Fidelity Capital & Income Fund) and EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) are both funds - FAGIX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while EWL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland Index. FAGIX is actively managed, while EWL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAGIX returned 8.03%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for EWL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAGIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWL.
Performance
FAGIX vs. EWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGIX achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGIX has underperformed EWL with an annualized return of 8.03%, while EWL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.
FAGIX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
EWL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
FAGIX vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGIX Fidelity Capital & Income Fund | 7.40% | 12.38% | 10.69% | 13.02% | -11.50% | 11.13% | 9.95% | 18.96% | -7.17% | 11.66% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 4.60% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGIX and EWL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996 | 0.43 |
The correlation between FAGIX and EWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAGIX vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank
FAGIX
EWL
FAGIX vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAGIX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.15 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 1.01 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.86 | 3.24 | +16.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAGIX vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGIX drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, smaller than the maximum EWL drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGIX and EWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGIX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.97% | -51.62% | +13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -13.48% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.26% | -13.48% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -28.99% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.45% | -28.99% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -3.63% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -11.08% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 4.22% | -3.37% |
Volatility
FAGIX vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) is 2.71%, while iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that FAGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAGIX | EWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 5.12% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.30% | 12.70% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.42% | 16.09% | -9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 16.13% | -9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 16.47% | -8.63% |
FAGIX vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAGIX vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison
FAGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than EWL's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
FAGIX Fidelity Capital & Income Fund | 4.47% | 4.74% | 5.02% | 5.28% | 10.25% | 6.08% | 4.59% | 5.00% | 5.67% | 5.05% | 4.57% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAGIX and EWL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to FAGIX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGIX dropped -37.97% vs EWL's -51.62%.
FAGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAGIX and EWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer