FAFAX vs. LCCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX).
FAFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 24, 2003. LCCMX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 14, 2005.
Performance
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A | -0.68% | 9.76% | 4.04% | 7.83% | -11.67% | 2.92% | 8.46% | 10.85% | -2.03% | 7.12% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | -2.35% | 9.73% | 18.51% | 13.73% | -13.30% | 1.30% | 7.52% | 0.65% | 2.35% | 1.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAFAX achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly higher than LCCMX's -2.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAFAX having a 3.77% annualized return and LCCMX not far behind at 3.75%.
FAFAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
LCCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAFAX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FAFAX
LCCMX
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAFAX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 2.64 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.61 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 5.71 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAFAX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.60 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.76 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFAX and LCCMX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison
FAFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than LCCMX's 8.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A | 3.01% | 2.93% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 5.70% | 5.06% | 3.60% | 3.52% | 5.39% | 3.13% | 2.86% | 2.82% |
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 8.33% | 8.93% | 10.39% | 8.55% | 5.68% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.75% |
Drawdowns
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFAX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFAX and LCCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFAX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -24.57% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.73% | -3.76% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -19.20% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | -24.57% | +8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -3.76% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -2.81% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.06% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FAFAX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) at 1.55%. This indicates that FAFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAFAX | LCCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 1.55% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 3.50% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 4.25% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 5.78% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 6.30% | -1.73% |