FAEGX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FAEGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 10, 1992. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAEGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M | -5.52% | 13.98% | 14.72% | 34.88% | -24.83% | 22.39% | 43.02% | 33.25% | -0.19% | 34.52% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -3.98% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAEGX achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FAEGX has outperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.
FAEGX
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -5.14%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
FSKAX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAEGX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAEGX
FSKAX
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAEGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.98 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 7.20 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAEGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.98 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.74 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAEGX and FSKAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FAEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FSKAX's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAEGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M | 0.69% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 2.34% | 13.01% | 12.18% | 9.80% | 7.24% | 12.32% | 6.48% | 2.40% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.06% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAEGX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAEGX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAEGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.85% | -35.01% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -12.42% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.02% | -25.39% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -35.01% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.01% | -6.20% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -4.05% | -12.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.60% | +1.09% |
Volatility
FAEGX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 5.52%. This indicates that FAEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAEGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 5.52% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 9.85% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 18.69% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 17.42% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.44% | +2.36% |