FAEGX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAEGX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FAEGX returned 17.06%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAEGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAEGX achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAEGX having a 17.06% annualized return and FCNTX not far ahead at 17.53%.

FAEGX

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 5.55%
• YTD: 14.04%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 28.36%
• 3Y*: 19.34%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 17.06%

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 27.27%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAEGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M	14.04%	13.98%	14.72%	34.88%	-24.83%	22.39%	43.02%	33.25%	-0.19%	34.52%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FAEGX and FCNTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 1992	0.94

The correlation between FAEGX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAEGX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAEGX

FAEGX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FAEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FAEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FAEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FAEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FAEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAEGX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.77	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.46	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.20	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	9.33	-0.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAEGX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAEGX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.77	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.79	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.89	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.78	-0.24

Drawdowns

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAEGX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAEGX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAEGX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.85%	-49.19%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-11.30%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.02%	-19.75%	-11.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.02%	-32.59%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.16%	-32.59%	+1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	0.00%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.15%	-8.16%	-7.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	2.65%	+0.72%

Volatility

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M (FAEGX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FAEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAEGX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	3.30%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	10.47%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	14.02%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	19.15%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.87%	19.68%	+1.19%

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAEGX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FAEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAEGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class M	0.57%	0.65%	0.00%	0.58%	2.34%	13.01%	12.18%	9.80%	7.24%	12.32%	6.48%	2.40%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAEGX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FAEGX and FCNTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAEGX or FCNTX?

FAEGX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to FCNTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAEGX dropped -63.85% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.