PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAD vs. TPLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAD vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than TPLC's 11.20% return.


FAD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-4.21%
6M
10.52%
YTD
13.47%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
13.70%
ALL TIME*
10.35%

TPLC

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.18M$2.71M$2.70M
$634.79K$704.66K$1.85M

FAD vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
13.47%17.23%23.85%19.07%-24.06%21.17%34.92%5.19%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
11.20%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%14.55%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and TPLC is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2019

0.86

The correlation between FAD and TPLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAD vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAD
TPLC

Technology

28.2%
18.6%

Industrials

24.4%
23.4%

Healthcare

15.9%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
8.8%

Financial Services

7.6%
11.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.5%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
3.6%

Energy

1.4%
7.2%

Utilities

1.4%
11.2%

Technology

FAD
28.2%
TPLC
18.6%

Industrials

FAD
24.4%
TPLC
23.4%

Healthcare

FAD
15.9%
TPLC
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FAD
9.9%
TPLC
8.8%

Financial Services

FAD
7.6%
TPLC
11.5%

Real Estate

FAD
3.8%
TPLC
0.2%

Communication Services

FAD
2.8%
TPLC
0.2%

Basic Materials

FAD
2.5%
TPLC
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

FAD
2.1%
TPLC
3.6%

Energy

FAD
1.4%
TPLC
7.2%

Utilities

FAD
1.4%
TPLC
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAD vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAD
FAD Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAD vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FADTPLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.59

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

5.75

+0.78

FAD vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the TPLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and TPLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAD vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, which is greater than TPLC's maximum drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and TPLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FADTPLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-38.02%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-7.58%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-18.18%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.99%

-21.63%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-1.31%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-5.20%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.09%

+1.33%

Volatility

FAD vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 2.63%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FADTPLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

2.63%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

8.37%

+8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

11.58%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

16.12%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

19.73%

+1.62%

FAD vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAD vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than TPLC's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.10%0.09%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.83%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAD and TPLC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAD has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to TPLC (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAD dropped -54.33% vs TPLC's -38.02%.

On 5-year performance, FAD leads with 9.39% vs 7.98% for TPLC. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAD has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FAD.

TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.10% for FAD.

FAD tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FAD and 0.52% for TPLC.

FAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAD and TPLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer