PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAD vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAD vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


FAD

1D
-0.15%
1M
6.70%
YTD
17.25%
6M
17.16%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
14.53%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAD vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
17.25%17.23%23.85%19.07%-24.06%21.17%34.92%26.66%-6.45%25.75%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and FTXL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.74

The correlation between FAD and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAD vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAD
FTXL

Industrials

26.1%
0.5%

Technology

24.1%
99.5%

Healthcare

15.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%

-

Financial Services

8.0%

-

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Industrials

FAD
26.1%
FTXL
0.5%

Technology

FAD
24.1%
FTXL
99.5%

Healthcare

FAD
15.4%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAD
10.8%
FTXL

-

Financial Services

FAD
8.0%
FTXL

-

Real Estate

FAD
4.1%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

FAD
3.1%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

FAD
3.0%
FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

FAD
2.4%
FTXL

-

Energy

FAD
1.6%
FTXL

-

Utilities

FAD
1.6%
FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAD vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAD
FAD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAD vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FADFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.78

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

15.62

-12.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

58.28

-45.74

FAD vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FADFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

6.33

-4.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.97

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.94

-0.43

Drawdowns

FAD vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FADFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-43.87%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-14.51%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-41.57%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.99%

-43.87%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-10.56%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.88%

-1.12%

Volatility

FAD vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) is 6.01%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that FAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FADFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

14.28%

-8.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

28.98%

-14.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

35.94%

-17.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

36.02%

-15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

34.25%

-13.07%

FAD vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAD vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.09%0.09%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAD and FTXL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to FAD (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAD dropped -54.33% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 11.25% for FAD. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FAD has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 11.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FAD.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.09% for FAD.

FAD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FAD tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FAD and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAD and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer