PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACTX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class M (FACTX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACTX achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly higher than GGHCX's -7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FACTX has outperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return.


FACTX

1D
-1.66%
1M
1.91%
YTD
-3.54%
6M
-16.21%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
-0.91%
10Y*
6.58%

GGHCX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-7.49%
6M
-9.37%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACTX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class M
-3.54%-0.76%3.72%3.54%-13.30%10.97%20.77%27.57%6.91%23.72%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
-7.49%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FACTX and GGHCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996

0.87

The correlation between FACTX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACTX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACTX
FACTX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FACTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACTX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FACTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class M (FACTX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACTXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

0.46

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

0.74

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.08

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.44

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.33

1.02

-0.69

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the GGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACTX and GGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACTXGGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.46

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.15

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.36

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACTX drawdown since its inception was -46.07%, which is greater than GGHCX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACTX and GGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACTXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.07%

-40.23%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.87%

-13.53%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.87%

-16.86%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.47%

-25.37%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.47%

-29.34%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.68%

-11.85%

-6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-8.82%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

5.80%

+6.06%

Volatility

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class M (FACTX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 4.40%. This indicates that FACTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACTXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.40%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

10.12%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.01%

13.09%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

15.53%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.45%

+1.82%

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACTX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACTX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

FACTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACTX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class M
0.00%0.00%13.70%0.00%0.00%6.80%6.10%0.35%5.45%0.00%0.00%6.90%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
6.15%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACTX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FACTX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to GGHCX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACTX dropped -46.07% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.

GGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACTX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer