PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACGX vs. FZAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACGX achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly lower than FZAPX's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FACGX has outperformed FZAPX with an annualized return of 21.06%, while FZAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.31% annualized return.


FACGX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.11%
6M
13.65%
YTD
15.44%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
28.60%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
21.06%

FZAPX

1D
0.38%
1M
2.92%
6M
14.42%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACGX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
15.44%21.26%37.68%44.06%-38.87%10.46%67.34%39.19%14.13%33.63%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
16.93%18.98%19.88%27.05%-19.49%23.25%25.03%32.34%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FACGX and FZAPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.91

The correlation between FACGX and FZAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACGX vs. FZAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACGX
FACGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FACGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FACGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAPX
FZAPX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FZAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FACGXFZAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.34

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

15.57

-9.40

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FZAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACGX and FZAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACGX drawdown since its inception was -65.53%, which is greater than FZAPX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACGX and FZAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACGXFZAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.53%

-34.37%

-31.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.45%

-9.20%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-20.84%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.17%

-25.20%

-19.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.17%

-34.37%

-10.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

0.00%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-4.53%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

1.97%

+2.59%

Volatility

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) at 4.80%. This indicates that FACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACGXFZAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

4.80%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.69%

11.18%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.35%

13.91%

+6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.16%

17.90%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

18.55%

+5.45%

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACGX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAPX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACGX vs. FZAPX - Dividend Comparison

FACGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than FZAPX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACGX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C
4.56%5.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%6.13%4.87%14.01%8.00%17.39%12.23%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
4.18%4.88%4.91%2.12%0.39%1.47%5.33%6.18%4.59%3.07%1.13%5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FACGX and FZAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FACGX has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to FZAPX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACGX dropped -65.53% vs FZAPX's -34.37%.

FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACGX and FZAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer