PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, F50A.DE achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than XU61.DE's 12.67% return.


F50A.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.81%
6M
10.16%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*

XU61.DE

1D
-0.72%
1M
0.91%
YTD
12.67%
6M
13.88%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
F50A.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.81%8.58%25.85%6.40%
XU61.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR
12.67%17.07%10.27%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between F50A.DE and XU61.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023

0.61

The correlation between F50A.DE and XU61.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

F50A.DE
F50A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XU61.DE
XU61.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XU61.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


F50A.DEXU61.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.31

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

17.45

-2.83

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the XU61.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of F50A.DE and XU61.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


F50A.DEXU61.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.53

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.80

-1.08

Drawdowns

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum F50A.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.88%, which is greater than XU61.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F50A.DE and XU61.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


F50A.DEXU61.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.88%

-12.73%

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-5.90%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.75%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-1.39%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.46%

+0.20%

Volatility

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) is 2.63%, while BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure UCITS ETF EUR (XU61.DE) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that F50A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XU61.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


F50A.DEXU61.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

3.30%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

7.78%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

10.06%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

10.63%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

10.63%

+7.07%

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

F50A.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XU61.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

F50A.DE vs. XU61.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither F50A.DE nor XU61.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


F50A.DE and XU61.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for XU61.DE.

F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while XU61.DE tracks ECPI Global ESG Infrastructure Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas Easy. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for F50A.DE and 0.31% for XU61.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for F50A.DE and XU61.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer