F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE
F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) and DX2E.DE (Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while DX2E.DE tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, F50A.DE returned 25.97% vs 20.10% for DX2E.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. F50A.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DX2E.DE.
Performance
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with F50A.DE having a 13.03% return and DX2E.DE slightly lower at 12.81%.
F50A.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DX2E.DE
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 13.03% | 8.58% | -1.22% |
DX2E.DE Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.81% | 7.67% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between F50A.DE and DX2E.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024 | 0.45 |
The correlation between F50A.DE and DX2E.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
F50A.DE
DX2E.DE
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| F50A.DE | DX2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 4.18 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 10.39 | -7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F50A.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, smaller than the maximum DX2E.DE drawdown of -63.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F50A.DE and DX2E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F50A.DE | DX2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -63.84% | +42.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -4.79% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -1.35% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -18.81% | +11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 1.93% | +7.31% |
Volatility
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) is 2.50%, while Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that F50A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DX2E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F50A.DE | DX2E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.81% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 7.78% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 9.79% | +14.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 12.20% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 14.75% | +7.58% |
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
F50A.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DX2E.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
F50A.DE vs. DX2E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither F50A.DE nor DX2E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
F50A.DE and DX2E.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DX2E.DE.
F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while DX2E.DE tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for F50A.DE and 0.60% for DX2E.DE.
Find the right allocation for F50A.DE and DX2E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer