F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE
F500.DE (Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) and IBCK.DE (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - F500.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG+ while IBCK.DE tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, F500.DE returned 15.55%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for IBCK.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. F500.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IBCK.DE.
Performance
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F500.DE achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than IBCK.DE's 5.14% return.
F500.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F500.DE Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 11.02% | 5.41% | 31.71% | 24.10% | -14.24% | 43.57% | 6.01% | 34.18% | -11.70% |
IBCK.DE iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.14% | -0.69% | 25.61% | 6.20% | -6.04% | 35.73% | -2.18% | 34.85% | -10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between F500.DE and IBCK.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between F500.DE and IBCK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
F500.DE
IBCK.DE
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (F500.DE) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| F500.DE | IBCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.19 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 1.83 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.92 | 5.31 | +9.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| F500.DE | IBCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 1.07 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.79 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F500.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCK.DE drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F500.DE and IBCK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F500.DE | IBCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -33.11% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -5.08% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | -17.55% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.49% | -17.55% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -4.50% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.75% | +0.16% |
Volatility
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (F500.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) at 2.26%. This indicates that F500.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F500.DE | IBCK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.26% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 5.71% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 8.73% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 12.37% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 14.02% | +2.98% |
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
F500.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCK.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
F500.DE vs. IBCK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither F500.DE nor IBCK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
F500.DE and IBCK.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F500.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F500.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCK.DE.
F500.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG+, while IBCK.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for F500.DE and 0.20% for IBCK.DE.
Find the right allocation for F500.DE and IBCK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer