EZRO vs. QQWZ
EZRO (AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZRO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by AlphaDroid, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZRO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.
Performance
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZRO achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 18.92% return.
EZRO
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQWZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 37.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZRO AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF | 8.53% | -1.65% |
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF | 18.92% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZRO and QQWZ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZRO vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank
EZRO
QQWZ
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZRO | QQWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 3.26 | -2.67 |
Drawdowns
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZRO drawdown since its inception was -11.57%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZRO and QQWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZRO | QQWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -7.81% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -0.24% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -1.36% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZRO | QQWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.57% | 13.77% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 14.22% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 14.22% | +4.35% |
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZRO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZRO vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison
EZRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZRO AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZRO and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EZRO.
QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for EZRO.
EZRO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EZRO and 0.49% for QQWZ.
Find the right allocation for EZRO and QQWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer