EZRO vs. FTLS
EZRO (AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF) and FTLS (First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZRO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by AlphaDroid, while FTLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZRO charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for FTLS.
Performance
EZRO vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EZRO having a 4.97% return and FTLS slightly higher at 5.04%.
EZRO
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTLS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
EZRO vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZRO AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF | 4.97% | -3.19% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 5.04% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZRO and FTLS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZRO vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank
EZRO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTLS
EZRO vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZRO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZRO vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZRO drawdown since its inception was -12.08%, smaller than the maximum FTLS drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZRO and FTLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZRO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -20.54% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -0.50% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -2.69% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
EZRO vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZRO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 8.36% | +12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 10.57% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 11.30% | +9.38% |
EZRO vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZRO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZRO vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison
EZRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZRO AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZRO and FTLS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZRO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZRO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.
FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for EZRO.
EZRO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while FTLS is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EZRO and 1.60% for FTLS.
Find the right allocation for EZRO and FTLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer