EZBC vs. MSBT
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
EZBC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- -25.05%
- YTD
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -44.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.11M | $3.63M | $7.00M | |
| $6.64M | $6.25M | $10.51M |
EZBC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -8.92% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -13.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and MSBT is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
MSBT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -28.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -28.33% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.02% | -23.35% | -26.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -13.41% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.65% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.37% | 35.47% | +8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 35.47% | +14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 35.47% | +14.05% |
EZBC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZBC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EZBC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.
EZBC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer