EZBC vs. MSBT
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
EZBC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZBC
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -17.79%
- YTD
- -28.83%
- 6M
- -28.96%
- 1Y
- -39.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -9.73% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and MSBT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
MSBT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -26.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -26.46% | -25.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.46% | -23.99% | -26.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.89% | -8.48% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.56% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.23% | 37.06% | +7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.15% | 37.06% | +13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.15% | 37.06% | +13.09% |
EZBC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZBC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EZBC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.
EZBC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer