EZBC vs. MSBT
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
EZBC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZBC
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -14.30%
- YTD
- -23.26%
- 6M
- -26.35%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -6.05%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -5.89% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and MSBT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
MSBT
EZBC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -1.02 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -18.03% | -31.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.58% | -18.03% | -28.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -3.48% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.26% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.59% | 32.70% | +10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 32.70% | +17.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 32.70% | +17.37% |
EZBC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZBC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, EZBC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.
EZBC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer