EZBC vs. ETHE.SW
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW).
EZBC and ETHE.SW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZBC is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024. ETHE.SW is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Feb 23, 2021.
Performance
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -22.55% | -6.56% | 100.18% |
ETHE.SW CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) | -31.28% | -9.25% | 28.08% |
Different Trading Currencies
EZBC is traded in USD, while ETHE.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the ETHE.SW values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -22.55% return, which is significantly higher than ETHE.SW's -31.28% return.
EZBC
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- -22.55%
- 6M
- -40.81%
- 1Y
- -17.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE.SW
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- -31.28%
- 6M
- -50.10%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHE.SW's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
ETHE.SW
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZBC | ETHE.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.18 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | 0.92 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.17 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 0.36 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZBC | ETHE.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.18 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.07 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and ETHE.SW is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor ETHE.SW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum ETHE.SW drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and ETHE.SW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | ETHE.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -77.57% | +28.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.37% | -61.87% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.09% | -62.57% | +16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -42.54% | +28.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.07% | 29.52% | -6.45% |
Volatility
EZBC vs. ETHE.SW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) is 13.08%, while CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW) has a volatility of 45.67%. This indicates that EZBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHE.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | ETHE.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 45.67% | -32.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.80% | 65.41% | -28.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.40% | 85.09% | -39.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 88.41% | -37.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 88.43% | -37.30% |