EZBC vs. CBOL
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EZBC is passively managed, while CBOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
EZBC vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -28.20% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -1.94% return.
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- -25.05%
- YTD
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -44.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $64.22K | $31.00K | $17.40K | |
| $3.11M | $3.63M | $7.00M |
EZBC vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -28.20% | -24.59% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -1.94% | -2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and CBOL is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
CBOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZBC | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -5.05% | -48.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.02% | -4.56% | -45.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -3.48% | -14.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.65% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.37% | 3.65% | +40.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 3.65% | +45.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 3.65% | +45.87% |
EZBC vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZBC vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EZBC and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.
CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
EZBC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer